Warnings: teeks99-dkr-mc14-20 - numeric/interval / clang-linux-14~c++20
Rev 0192b65ba741b8611caf5763510cc7c922bc4b4b / Thu, 15 Oct 2026 20:18:52 +0000
cmp
../libs/numeric/interval/test/cmp.cpp:28:18: warning: ISO C++20 considers use of overloaded operator '==' (with operand types 'const I' (aka 'const interval<int, policies<empty_class, boost::numeric::interval_lib::checking_base<int>>>') and 'const I') to be ambiguous despite there being a unique best viable function [-Wambiguous-reversed-operator]
../libs/numeric/interval/test/cmp.cpp:29:16: warning: ISO C++20 considers use of overloaded operator '!=' (with operand types 'const I' (aka 'const interval<int, policies<empty_class, boost::numeric::interval_lib::checking_base<int>>>') and 'const I') to be ambiguous despite there being a unique best viable function with non-reversed arguments [-Wambiguous-reversed-operator]
../libs/numeric/interval/test/cmp.cpp:52:17: warning: ISO C++20 considers use of overloaded operator '==' (with operand types 'const I' (aka 'const interval<int, policies<empty_class, boost::numeric::interval_lib::checking_base<int>>>') and 'const I') to be ambiguous despite there being a unique best viable function [-Wambiguous-reversed-operator]
../libs/numeric/interval/test/cmp.cpp:53:17: warning: ISO C++20 considers use of overloaded operator '!=' (with operand types 'const I' (aka 'const interval<int, policies<empty_class, boost::numeric::interval_lib::checking_base<int>>>') and 'const I') to be ambiguous despite there being a unique best viable function with non-reversed arguments [-Wambiguous-reversed-operator]
../libs/numeric/interval/test/cmp.cpp:76:17: warning: ISO C++20 considers use of overloaded operator '==' (with operand types 'const I' (aka 'const interval<int, policies<empty_class, boost::numeric::interval_lib::checking_base<int>>>') and 'const I') to be ambiguous despite there being a unique best viable function [-Wambiguous-reversed-operator]
../libs/numeric/interval/test/cmp.cpp:77:17: warning: ISO C++20 considers use of overloaded operator '!=' (with operand types 'const I' (aka 'const interval<int, policies<empty_class, boost::numeric::interval_lib::checking_base<int>>>') and 'const I') to be ambiguous despite there being a unique best viable function with non-reversed arguments [-Wambiguous-reversed-operator]
../libs/numeric/interval/test/cmp.cpp:169:17: warning: ISO C++20 considers use of overloaded operator '==' (with operand types 'const I' (aka 'const interval<int, policies<empty_class, boost::numeric::interval_lib::checking_base<int>>>') and 'const I') to be ambiguous despite there being a unique best viable function [-Wambiguous-reversed-operator]
../libs/numeric/interval/test/cmp.cpp:170:17: warning: ISO C++20 considers use of overloaded operator '!=' (with operand types 'const I' (aka 'const interval<int, policies<empty_class, boost::numeric::interval_lib::checking_base<int>>>') and 'const I') to be ambiguous despite there being a unique best viable function with non-reversed arguments [-Wambiguous-reversed-operator]
../libs/numeric/interval/test/cmp.cpp:181:16: warning: ISO C++20 considers use of overloaded operator '==' (with operand types 'const I' (aka 'const interval<int, policies<empty_class, boost::numeric::interval_lib::checking_base<int>>>') and 'const I') to be ambiguous despite there being a unique best viable function [-Wambiguous-reversed-operator]
../libs/numeric/interval/test/cmp.cpp:182:18: warning: ISO C++20 considers use of overloaded operator '!=' (with operand types 'const I' (aka 'const interval<int, policies<empty_class, boost::numeric::interval_lib::checking_base<int>>>') and 'const I') to be ambiguous despite there being a unique best viable function with non-reversed arguments [-Wambiguous-reversed-operator]
10 warnings generated.
                
cmp_exn
../libs/numeric/interval/test/cmp_exn.cpp:79:17: warning: ISO C++20 considers use of overloaded operator '==' (with operand types 'const I' (aka 'const interval<int, policies<empty_class, my_checking>>') and 'const I') to be ambiguous despite there being a unique best viable function [-Wambiguous-reversed-operator]
../libs/numeric/interval/test/cmp_exn.cpp:80:17: warning: ISO C++20 considers use of overloaded operator '!=' (with operand types 'const I' (aka 'const interval<int, policies<empty_class, my_checking>>') and 'const I') to be ambiguous despite there being a unique best viable function with non-reversed arguments [-Wambiguous-reversed-operator]
../libs/numeric/interval/test/cmp_exn.cpp:85:17: warning: ISO C++20 considers use of overloaded operator '==' (with operand types 'const I' (aka 'const interval<int, policies<empty_class, my_checking>>') and 'const I') to be ambiguous despite there being a unique best viable function [-Wambiguous-reversed-operator]
../libs/numeric/interval/test/cmp_exn.cpp:86:17: warning: ISO C++20 considers use of overloaded operator '!=' (with operand types 'const I' (aka 'const interval<int, policies<empty_class, my_checking>>') and 'const I') to be ambiguous despite there being a unique best viable function with non-reversed arguments [-Wambiguous-reversed-operator]
4 warnings generated.